netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2 1/1] can: c_can: Added support for Bosch C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D0A5236.5070900@grandegger.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:53:58 +0100
From:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To:	Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
CC:	Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...com>,
	Socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2 1/1] can: c_can: Added support for Bosch
 C_CAN	controller

On 12/16/2010 01:09 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> On Thursday, December 16, 2010 6:11 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> 
>> Ah, oh, I just realized that the register layout is almost identical to
>> the recently accepted *pch_can* driver. Tomoya, does pch_can use a c_can
>> core? Well, then it makes really sense to have a generic c_can driver
>> for the SPEAR, PCH, etc. Board specific details are handled via platform
>> definition. This driver already provides that functionality, IFAICS.
> 
> Hi Wolfgang,
> 
> It seems pch_can similar to c_can.
> However, sorry, I don't know if pch_can core is the same as c_can since
> LSI is provided by Intel.
> If necessary, please contact to Intel.

You could also try to use that driver. I'm rather sure that it does work
on your hardware as well.

Wolfgang.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html