[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101216.103156.104072504.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:31:56 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: wg@...ndegger.com
Cc: tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com, bhupesh.sharma@...com,
Socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2 1/1] can: c_can: Added support for
Bosch C_CAN controller
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:53:58 +0100
> On 12/16/2010 01:09 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
>> On Thursday, December 16, 2010 6:11 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, oh, I just realized that the register layout is almost identical to
>>> the recently accepted *pch_can* driver. Tomoya, does pch_can use a c_can
>>> core? Well, then it makes really sense to have a generic c_can driver
>>> for the SPEAR, PCH, etc. Board specific details are handled via platform
>>> definition. This driver already provides that functionality, IFAICS.
>>
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> It seems pch_can similar to c_can.
>> However, sorry, I don't know if pch_can core is the same as c_can since
>> LSI is provided by Intel.
>> If necessary, please contact to Intel.
>
> You could also try to use that driver. I'm rather sure that it does work
> on your hardware as well.
Indeed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists