[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101219.224350.260095315.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:43:50 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shanwei@...fujitsu.com
Cc: albertpretorius@...oo.co.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: IPV6 loopback bound socket succeeds connecting to remote host
From: Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:31:28 +0800
> David Miller wrote, at 12/17/2010 04:18 AM:
>> Your approach will only modify socket based route handling, it will
>> not handle the ipv6 forwarding case which as per the quoted RFC
>> sections must be handled too.
>
> For the ipv6 forwarding case, we have done the check in ip6_forward().
>
> 493 int addrtype = ipv6_addr_type(&hdr->saddr);
> 494
> 495 /* This check is security critical. */
> 496 if (addrtype == IPV6_ADDR_ANY ||
> 497 addrtype & (IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST | IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK))
> 498 goto error;
Indeed, thanks for pointing this out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists