[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D0EF840.2020108@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:31:28 +0800
From: Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: albertpretorius@...oo.co.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: IPV6 loopback bound socket succeeds connecting to remote host
David Miller wrote, at 12/17/2010 04:18 AM:
> Your approach will only modify socket based route handling, it will
> not handle the ipv6 forwarding case which as per the quoted RFC
> sections must be handled too.
For the ipv6 forwarding case, we have done the check in ip6_forward().
493 int addrtype = ipv6_addr_type(&hdr->saddr);
494
495 /* This check is security critical. */
496 if (addrtype == IPV6_ADDR_ANY ||
497 addrtype & (IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST | IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK))
498 goto error;
--
Best Regards
-----
Shan Wei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists