| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4D12DE47.50200@intel.com> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:29:43 -0800 From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "hadi@...erus.ca" <hadi@...erus.ca>, "shemminger@...tta.com" <shemminger@...tta.com>, "tgraf@...radead.org" <tgraf@...radead.org>, "eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, "bhutchings@...arflare.com" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>, "nhorman@...driver.com" <nhorman@...driver.com> Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2 1/3] net: implement mechanism for HW based QOS On 12/22/2010 1:12 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 11:28 -0800, John Fastabend wrote: >> This patch provides a mechanism for lower layer devices to >> steer traffic using skb->priority to tx queues. This allows >> for hardware based QOS schemes to use the default qdisc without >> incurring the penalties related to global state and the qdisc >> lock. While reliably receiving skbs on the correct tx ring >> to avoid head of line blocking resulting from shuffling in >> the LLD. Finally, all the goodness from txq caching and xps/rps >> can still be leveraged. > > Is there any chance this might be applicable to the 802.11 layer as > well? We will definitely still need an ndo_select_queue handler to reset > in the case where the peer doesn't support QoS, but it seems the part > that depends on the frame itself could be pushed out to the generic > framework instead of having net/wireless/util.c:cfg80211_classify8021d? > > johannes > Johannes, I took a quick look at this and I believe it should be doable. It would be nice to completely remove the ndo_select_queue if possible though. I probably won't have a chance to look any further into this for at least a week maybe two. So I'll think about it a bit more later unless someone else gets there first. Thanks, John. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists