[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101226154709.5b24f976@nehalam>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 15:47:09 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"hadi@...erus.ca" <hadi@...erus.ca>,
"tgraf@...radead.org" <tgraf@...radead.org>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"bhutchings@...arflare.com" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"nhorman@...driver.com" <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2 1/3] net: implement mechanism for HW
based QOS
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:29:43 -0800
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com> wrote:
> On 12/22/2010 1:12 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 11:28 -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> >> This patch provides a mechanism for lower layer devices to
> >> steer traffic using skb->priority to tx queues. This allows
> >> for hardware based QOS schemes to use the default qdisc without
> >> incurring the penalties related to global state and the qdisc
> >> lock. While reliably receiving skbs on the correct tx ring
> >> to avoid head of line blocking resulting from shuffling in
> >> the LLD. Finally, all the goodness from txq caching and xps/rps
> >> can still be leveraged.
> >
> > Is there any chance this might be applicable to the 802.11 layer as
> > well? We will definitely still need an ndo_select_queue handler to reset
> > in the case where the peer doesn't support QoS, but it seems the part
> > that depends on the frame itself could be pushed out to the generic
> > framework instead of having net/wireless/util.c:cfg80211_classify8021d?
> >
> > johannes
> >
>
> Johannes,
>
> I took a quick look at this and I believe it should be doable. It would be nice to completely remove the ndo_select_queue if possible though.
>
> I probably won't have a chance to look any further into this for at least a week maybe two. So I'll think about it a bit more later unless someone else gets there first.
>
> Thanks,
> John.
The Beceem Wimax driver has same kind of select queue.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists