netdev - Re: [PATCH] Ceph: Fix a use-after-free bug in ceph_destroy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:24:57 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To:	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
cc:	ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ceph: Fix a use-after-free bug in
 ceph_destroy_client().

On Sat, 25 Dec 2010, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In net/ceph/ceph_common.c::ceph_destroy_client() the pointer 'client' is
> > freed by kfree() and subsequently used in a call to dout() - use after
> > free bug.
> 
> Not really. %p reads only the address of "client".
> kfree() does not alter this address.
> 

Ok, I see your point and you are correct. But still, the patch does not 
change behaviour and it makes it absolutely clear that there's no 
use-after-free bug, so it might still have merit... or?

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>            http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html