netdev - Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1293967996.2535.76.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Sun, 02 Jan 2011 12:33:16 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol

Le dimanche 02 janvier 2011 à 12:17 +0100, Stefani Seibold a écrit :
> Am Samstag, den 01.01.2011, 23:23 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet:

> > 3) I see UDPLITE references in your code. Are you sure UDPCP protocol
> > can really work on top of UDPLITE ? I think not, so please remove dead
> > code.
> > 
> 
> I have not tested it yet. But i think i should work, the code is mostly
> stolen from the udp.c file. Since the stack not depend on the len field
> of the UDP header, it should not matter if UPD or UDP-Lite is used.
> 

Hmm, but isnt your :

udpcp_prot = udp_prot; /* in udpcp_init() */

implies that all UDPCP sockets you are going to provide to user are on
top of UDP, not UDPLITE ?

Also, could you provide a link to UDPCP protocol specs ?

Thanks


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html