| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1293969476.29869.2.camel@wall-e> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 12:57:56 +0100 From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol Am Sonntag, den 02.01.2011, 12:33 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet: > Le dimanche 02 janvier 2011 à 12:17 +0100, Stefani Seibold a écrit : > > Am Samstag, den 01.01.2011, 23:23 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet: > > > > 3) I see UDPLITE references in your code. Are you sure UDPCP protocol > > > can really work on top of UDPLITE ? I think not, so please remove dead > > > code. > > > > > > > I have not tested it yet. But i think i should work, the code is mostly > > stolen from the udp.c file. Since the stack not depend on the len field > > of the UDP header, it should not matter if UPD or UDP-Lite is used. > > > > Hmm, but isnt your : > > udpcp_prot = udp_prot; /* in udpcp_init() */ > > implies that all UDPCP sockets you are going to provide to user are on > top of UDP, not UDPLITE ? > Okay, i kick to udplite support away! > Also, could you provide a link to UDPCP protocol specs ? > http://read.pudn.com/downloads76/doc/project/283718/OBSAI/OBSAI/RP1_V2.0.PDF > Thanks > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists