netdev - Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 02 Jan 2011 12:57:56 +0100
From:	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol

Am Sonntag, den 02.01.2011, 12:33 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> Le dimanche 02 janvier 2011 à 12:17 +0100, Stefani Seibold a écrit :
> > Am Samstag, den 01.01.2011, 23:23 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> 
> > > 3) I see UDPLITE references in your code. Are you sure UDPCP protocol
> > > can really work on top of UDPLITE ? I think not, so please remove dead
> > > code.
> > > 
> > 
> > I have not tested it yet. But i think i should work, the code is mostly
> > stolen from the udp.c file. Since the stack not depend on the len field
> > of the UDP header, it should not matter if UPD or UDP-Lite is used.
> > 
> 
> Hmm, but isnt your :
> 
> udpcp_prot = udp_prot; /* in udpcp_init() */
> 
> implies that all UDPCP sockets you are going to provide to user are on
> top of UDP, not UDPLITE ?
> 

Okay, i kick to udplite support away!

> Also, could you provide a link to UDPCP protocol specs ?
> 

http://read.pudn.com/downloads76/doc/project/283718/OBSAI/OBSAI/RP1_V2.0.PDF

> Thanks
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html