netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v5 2/2] net_sched: implement a root container qdisc sch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:31:09 -0800
From:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
CC:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"hadi@...erus.ca" <hadi@...erus.ca>,
	"shemminger@...tta.com" <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	"tgraf@...radead.org" <tgraf@...radead.org>,
	"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	"bhutchings@...arflare.com" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	"nhorman@...driver.com" <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v5 2/2] net_sched: implement a root container
 qdisc sch_mqprio

On 1/5/2011 4:32 PM, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:38:44AM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 1/4/2011 2:59 PM, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:56:46AM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> ...
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* Always use supplied priority mappings */
>>>> +     for (i = 0; i < TC_BITMASK + 1; i++) {
>>>> +             if (netdev_set_prio_tc_map(dev, i, qopt->prio_tc_map[i])) {
>>>> +                     err = -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> This would probably trigger if we try qopt->num_tc == 0. Is it expected?
>>
>> netdev_set_prio_tc_map() returns 0 on sucess. This if(..) is a bit strange though.
>>
>>         err = netdev_set_prio_tc_map(dev, i, qopt->prio_tc_map[i])
>>         if (err)
>>                 ...
>>
>> Is cleaner IMHO.
> 
> Maybe. But I still wonder if qopt->num_tc == 0 is valid (by design)?
> (netdev_set_prio_tc_map() returns -EINVAL if dev->num_tc == 0)
> 

I guess I don't see how it returns -EINVAL. Although setting
qopt->num_tc = 0 is equivalent to disabling traffic classes so
it is a strange thing to do but I don't expect it should be a
problem.

static inline
int netdev_set_prio_tc_map(struct net_device *dev, u8 prio, u8 tc)
{
        if (tc >= dev->num_tc)
                return -EINVAL;

        dev->prio_tc_map[prio & TC_BITMASK] = tc & TC_BITMASK;
        return 0;
}

>>>> +static unsigned long mqprio_get(struct Qdisc *sch, u32 classid)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     unsigned int ntx = TC_H_MIN(classid);
>>>
>>> We need to 'get' tc classes too, eg for individual dumps. Then we
>>> should omit them in .leaf, .graft etc.
>>>
>>
>> OK missed this. Looks like iproute2 always sets NLM_F_DUMP which works because it uses cl_ops->walk
>>
>> # tc -s class show dev eth3 classid 800b:1
>> class mqprio 800b:1 root
>>  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
>>  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> 
> OK, then it might be only of theoretical value (for some other tools).
>>> Why dev->num_tc above, netdev_get_num_tc(dev) here, and dev->num_tc
>>> below?
>>
>> No reason just inconsistant I will use dev->num_tc.
> 
> Well, this would suggest netdev_get_num_tc() is redundant.
> 

Guess it is I can remove it.

static inline
u8 netdev_get_num_tc(const struct net_device *dev)
{
        return dev->num_tc;
}

>>>> +static void mqprio_walk(struct Qdisc *sch, struct qdisc_walker *arg)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct net_device *dev = qdisc_dev(sch);
>>>> +     unsigned long ntx;
>>>> +     u8 num_tc = netdev_get_num_tc(dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (arg->stop)
>>>> +             return;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* Walk hierarchy with a virtual class per tc */
>>>> +     arg->count = arg->skip;
>>>> +     for (ntx = arg->skip; ntx < dev->num_tx_queues + num_tc; ntx++) {
>>>
>>> Should we report possibly unused/unconfigured tx_queues?
>>
>> I think it may be OK select_queue() could push skbs onto these queues and we may still want to see the statistics in this case. Although (real_num_tx_queues + num_tc) may make sense I see no reason to show queues above real_num_tx_queues.
> 
> IMHO, pushing skbs to unconfigured/unwanted/disabled queues is a bug,
> and select should handle this, but probably it's a matter of taste.

certainly a bug for queues >= real_num_tx_queues.

> Btw, I wonder how dev->real_num_tx_queues is obeyed here.
> 

Its not. real_num_tx_queues is not handled correctly here also
real_num_tx_queues can be changed so this need to be handled as well.
This means an additional check in the options parsing.

> Thanks,
> Jarek P.
> 
> PS: No offense, but could you try cutting lines ~70c. It's strongly
> recommended on kernel lists.

None taken ~70c from now on.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html