netdev - Re: sch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7ivd1rsj6n.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:34:24 +0100
From:	Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@....jussieu.fr>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: sch_sfb

> I just looked at it out of interest after already having started my
> own version.

>>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/90225
>>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/90375

>> It was reviewed in particular by one Patrick McHardy.

> There's no reason to be pissed

Yes, there is.

First you object to my patch by making a bunch of unreasonable requests
(notably that I use the in-kernel classifiers, which are not usable with
Bloom filters).  Then it turns out you're implementing your own version
"from scratch".  And then you claim that you never saw my version in the
first place?

Patrick, what you're doing is not merely rude, it's actually unethical.

                                        Juliusz Chroboczek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html