netdev - Re: sch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:37:44 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@....jussieu.fr>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: sch_sfb

On 14.01.2011 14:34, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> I just looked at it out of interest after already having started my
>> own version.
> 
>>>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/90225
>>>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/90375
> 
>>> It was reviewed in particular by one Patrick McHardy.
> 
>> There's no reason to be pissed
> 
> Yes, there is.
> 
> First you object to my patch by making a bunch of unreasonable requests
> (notably that I use the in-kernel classifiers, which are not usable with
> Bloom filters).

They are - at least the flow classifier and others returning numerical
classids. Which is the one most useful for SFB.

> Then it turns out you're implementing your own version
> "from scratch".  And then you claim that you never saw my version in the
> first place?

I said I didn't remember reviewing it. If you read my first email,
I specifically stated that I had a look at your version and noticed
a few bugs,

> Patrick, what you're doing is not merely rude, it's actually unethical.

I'm not continuing this discussion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html