| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4D3051A8.6050305@trash.net> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:37:44 +0100 From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> To: Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@....jussieu.fr> CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: sch_sfb On 14.01.2011 14:34, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> I just looked at it out of interest after already having started my >> own version. > >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/90225 >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/90375 > >>> It was reviewed in particular by one Patrick McHardy. > >> There's no reason to be pissed > > Yes, there is. > > First you object to my patch by making a bunch of unreasonable requests > (notably that I use the in-kernel classifiers, which are not usable with > Bloom filters). They are - at least the flow classifier and others returning numerical classids. Which is the one most useful for SFB. > Then it turns out you're implementing your own version > "from scratch". And then you claim that you never saw my version in the > first place? I said I didn't remember reviewing it. If you read my first email, I specifically stated that I had a look at your version and noticed a few bugs, > Patrick, what you're doing is not merely rude, it's actually unethical. I'm not continuing this discussion. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists