netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] can: at91_can: clean up usage of AT91_MB_RX_FIRST and AT91_MB_RX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D3A83C2.4000609@grandegger.com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:14:10 +0100
From:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	mkl@...gutronix.de, Socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] can: at91_can: clean up usage of	AT91_MB_RX_FIRST
 and AT91_MB_RX_NUM

On 01/22/2011 01:54 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:50:36 +0100
> 
>> On 01/11/2011 02:21 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> This patch cleans up the usage of two macros which specify the mailbox
>>> usage. AT91_MB_RX_FIRST and AT91_MB_RX_NUM define the first and the
>>> number of RX mailboxes. The current driver uses these variables in an
>>> unclean way; assuming that AT91_MB_RX_FIRST is 0;
>>>
>>> This patch cleans up the usage of these macros, no longer assuming
>>> AT91_MB_RX_FIRST == 0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
>>
>> Any comments on this?
> 
> I would also seriously like to see these changes get some feedback,
> they've been rotting in patchwork for more than a week.

V2 was OK and it got my "Acked-by" here:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=129534267002747&w=2

Wolfgang.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html