[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110122075016.GA542@e-circ.dyndns.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:50:17 +0100
From: Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@....be>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mkl@...gutronix.de, Socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, wg@...ndegger.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] can: at91_can: clean up usage of
AT91_MB_RX_FIRST and AT91_MB_RX_NUM
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:54:09PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > On 01/11/2011 02:21 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> This patch cleans up the usage of two macros which specify the mailbox
> >> usage. AT91_MB_RX_FIRST and AT91_MB_RX_NUM define the first and the
> >> number of RX mailboxes. The current driver uses these variables in an
> >> unclean way; assuming that AT91_MB_RX_FIRST is 0;
> >>
> >> This patch cleans up the usage of these macros, no longer assuming
> >> AT91_MB_RX_FIRST == 0.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> >
> > Any comments on this?
>
> I would also seriously like to see these changes get some feedback,
> they've been rotting in patchwork for more than a week.
I have no experience with this specific chip.
IMO, this chip errata (as explained in the post) got an elegant solution.
That part definitely gets my
Acked-by: Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@....be>
Regards,
Kurt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists