netdev - Re: [PATCH v4] net-next-2.6: Allow ethtool to set interface in loopback mode.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2011 12:35:53 +1000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Laurent Chavey <chavey@...gle.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net-next-2.6: Allow ethtool to set interface in
 loopback mode.

On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:23 -0800, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> This patch enables ethtool to set the loopback mode on a given interface.
> By configuring the interface in loopback mode in conjunction with a policy
> route / rule, a userland application can stress the egress / ingress path
> exposing the flows of the change in progress and potentially help developer(s)
> understand the impact of those changes without even sending a packet out
> on the network.
> 
> Following set of commands illustrates one such example -
> 	a) ip -4 addr add 192.168.1.1/24 dev eth1
> 	b) ip -4 rule add from all iif eth1 lookup 250
> 	c) ip -4 route add local 0/0 dev lo proto kernel scope host table 250
> 	d) arp -Ds 192.168.1.100 eth1
> 	e) arp -Ds 192.168.1.200 eth1
> 	f) sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind=1
> 	g) sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.accept_local=1
> 	# Assuming that the machine has 8 cores
> 	h) taskset 000f netserver -L 192.168.1.200
> 	i) taskset 00f0 netperf -t TCP_CRR -L 192.168.1.100 -H 192.168.1.200 -l 30
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
[...]

If this version has been revised, you can't claim I reviewed it!
If it's a repost of an earlier version, you should say so.

I thought we agreed that loopback could be treated as a flag, anyway.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html