[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimdNjUrNJ0yhg0VvK2TdM6THT=TieXjLbsMNRBB@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:12:42 -0800
From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Laurent Chavey <chavey@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net-next-2.6: Allow ethtool to set interface in
loopback mode.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Ben Hutchings
<bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:23 -0800, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
>> This patch enables ethtool to set the loopback mode on a given interface.
>> By configuring the interface in loopback mode in conjunction with a policy
>> route / rule, a userland application can stress the egress / ingress path
>> exposing the flows of the change in progress and potentially help developer(s)
>> understand the impact of those changes without even sending a packet out
>> on the network.
>>
>> Following set of commands illustrates one such example -
>> a) ip -4 addr add 192.168.1.1/24 dev eth1
>> b) ip -4 rule add from all iif eth1 lookup 250
>> c) ip -4 route add local 0/0 dev lo proto kernel scope host table 250
>> d) arp -Ds 192.168.1.100 eth1
>> e) arp -Ds 192.168.1.200 eth1
>> f) sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind=1
>> g) sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.accept_local=1
>> # Assuming that the machine has 8 cores
>> h) taskset 000f netserver -L 192.168.1.200
>> i) taskset 00f0 netperf -t TCP_CRR -L 192.168.1.100 -H 192.168.1.200 -l 30
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> [...]
>
> If this version has been revised, you can't claim I reviewed it!
> If it's a repost of an earlier version, you should say so.
There were no code changes made since you reviewed last. I made some
formatting changes only and that's why I thought it would be
appropriate to put your name there.
>
> I thought we agreed that loopback could be treated as a flag, anyway.
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
> They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists