[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D4FBA89.606@Calva.COM>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:25:29 +0100
From: John Hughes <john@...va.COM>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
CC: Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: x25: possible skb leak on bad facilities
On 31/01/11 14:08, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Looking at the changes introduced in the commit below, we seem to
> introduce an skb leak when a packet with bad facilities are present:
>
> commit a6331d6f9a4298173b413cf99a40cc86a9d92c37
> Author: andrew hendry<andrew.hendry@...il.com>
> Date: Wed Nov 3 12:54:53 2010 +0000
>
> memory corruption in X.25 facilities parsing
>
> If I am understanding things correctly then we trigger a -1 return to
> the main packet dispatch loop, this being non-zero implies that we have
> requeued the skb and it should not be freed. As it was not requeued,
> I believe the skb is no longer referenced and then is leaked.
>
> Perhaps someone better aquainted with this code could review my analysis
> in the patch leader below. If accurate I believe we need the patch below
> to resolve this. If it is not then I suspect a comment is required on
> the -1 return.
>
> Thoughts?
>
Sadly, after nearly 30 years (1982-2010) we've just closed our last X.25
line so I can no longer test this.
Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists