netdev - Re: [patch net-next-2.6 3/4] bond: implement slave management operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110212132040.GA12156@psychotron.redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:20:42 +0100
From:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To:	Nicolas de Pesloüan 
	<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 3/4] bond: implement slave management
 operations

Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 02:16:18PM CET, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com wrote:
>Le 11/02/2011 16:22, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko<jpirko@...hat.com>
>>---
>>  drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>index 1df9f0e..f8e59f9 100644
>>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>@@ -4285,6 +4285,40 @@ unwind:
>>  	return res;
>>  }
>>
>>+static int bond_add_slave(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>>+			  struct net_device *slave_dev)
>>+{
>>+	return bond_enslave(bond_dev, slave_dev);
>>+}
>>+
>>+static int bond_del_slave(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>>+			  struct net_device *slave_dev)
>>+{
>>+	return bond_release(bond_dev, slave_dev);
>>+}
>>+
>
>Hi Jiri,
>
>Why did you add another level of function nesting (bond_add_slave()
>and bond_del_slave()) instead of using bond_enslave() and
>bond_release() directly in the structure below ?
>
>The function prototypes are identical.
>
>Or may be, rename bond_enslave() to bond_add_slave() and
>bond_release() to bond_del_slave(), for consistency.

Yes you are right - I did it in bonding by copy & paste code I did in
bridge and I didn't see that here it isn't necessary... Will remake this
in respin patchset.

Thanks.

Jirka
>
>>+	.ndo_add_slave		= bond_add_slave,
>>+	.ndo_del_slave		= bond_del_slave,
>>+	.ndo_get_slave_count	= bond_get_slave_count,
>>+	.ndo_get_slave		= bond_get_slave,
>
>	Nicolas.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html