netdev - RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] r8169: Support RTL8105E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <417606D3EB3A4B72AA3BEDC38D45C2B6@realtek.com.tw>
Date:	Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:17:20 +0800
From:	hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:	'Francois Romieu' <romieu@...zoreil.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] r8169: Support RTL8105E

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@...zoreil.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 3:33 PM
> To: Hayeswang
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] r8169: Support RTL8105E
> 
> > @@ -267,6 +272,12 @@ enum rtl8168_8101_registers {
> >  #define	EPHYAR_REG_MASK			0x1f
> >  #define	EPHYAR_REG_SHIFT		16
> >  #define	EPHYAR_DATA_MASK		0xffff
> > +	DLLPR			= 0xd0,
> > +#define	PM_SWITCH			(1 << 6)
> > +	TWSI			= 0xd2,
> > +	MCU			= 0xd3,
> > +#define	EN_NDP				(1 << 3)
> > +#define	EN_OOB_RESET			(1 << 2)
> >  	DBG_REG			= 0xd1,
> >  #define	FIX_NAK_1			(1 << 4)
> >  #define	FIX_NAK_2			(1 << 3)
> 
> Please pack them in increasing order and it will be perfect 
> (i.e. 0xd0, 0xd1, 0xd2, 0xd3 instead of current 0xd0, 0xd2 
> (?), 0xd3, 0xd1).

It's my mistake. I would fix that.

> 
> > +	rtl_writephy(tp, 0x1f, 0x0000);
> > +	rtl_writephy(tp, 0x18, 0x0310);
> > +	msleep(100);
> > +
> > +	if (rtl_apply_firmware(tp, FIRMWARE_8105E_1) < 0)
> > +		netif_warn(tp, probe, tp->dev, "unable to apply 
> firmware patch\n");
> > +
> > +	rtl_writephy_batch(tp, phy_reg_init, 
> ARRAY_SIZE(phy_reg_init)); }
> 
> The "if (RTL_R8(0xef) & 0x08)" and "if (RTL_R8(0xef) & 
> 0x010)" conditionals from the previous iteration have been 
> removed. If it is done on purpose, a short explanation or 
> notification in the description of the patch is always welcome.
> 

These two conditions are using for customization. I remove them and use the
default settings.
 
Best Regards,
Hayes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html