[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110221073328.GA12326@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:33:28 +0100
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] r8169: Support RTL8105E
Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> :
> Support the new chips for RTL8105E
>
> Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/r8169.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
> index 9eaf78f..ffe6b00 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c
[...]
> @@ -267,6 +272,12 @@ enum rtl8168_8101_registers {
> #define EPHYAR_REG_MASK 0x1f
> #define EPHYAR_REG_SHIFT 16
> #define EPHYAR_DATA_MASK 0xffff
> + DLLPR = 0xd0,
> +#define PM_SWITCH (1 << 6)
> + TWSI = 0xd2,
> + MCU = 0xd3,
> +#define EN_NDP (1 << 3)
> +#define EN_OOB_RESET (1 << 2)
> DBG_REG = 0xd1,
> #define FIX_NAK_1 (1 << 4)
> #define FIX_NAK_2 (1 << 3)
Please pack them in increasing order and it will be perfect
(i.e. 0xd0, 0xd1, 0xd2, 0xd3 instead of current 0xd0, 0xd2 (?), 0xd3, 0xd1).
[...]
> @@ -2435,6 +2452,33 @@ static void rtl8102e_hw_phy_config(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
> rtl_writephy_batch(tp, phy_reg_init, ARRAY_SIZE(phy_reg_init));
> }
>
> +static void rtl8105e_hw_phy_config(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
> +{
> + static const struct phy_reg phy_reg_init[] = {
> + {0x1f, 0x0005},
> + {0x1a, 0x0000},
> + {0x1f, 0x0000},
> +
> + {0x1f, 0x0004},
> + {0x1c, 0x0000},
> + {0x1f, 0x0000},
> +
> + {0x1f, 0x0001},
> + {0x15, 0x7701},
> + {0x1f, 0x0000}
^^ ^^
Minor nit: please insert spaces (as in similar declarations).
> + };
> +
> + /* Diable ALDPS before ram code */
^^ Missing "b".
> + rtl_writephy(tp, 0x1f, 0x0000);
> + rtl_writephy(tp, 0x18, 0x0310);
> + msleep(100);
> +
> + if (rtl_apply_firmware(tp, FIRMWARE_8105E_1) < 0)
> + netif_warn(tp, probe, tp->dev, "unable to apply firmware patch\n");
> +
> + rtl_writephy_batch(tp, phy_reg_init, ARRAY_SIZE(phy_reg_init));
> +}
The "if (RTL_R8(0xef) & 0x08)" and "if (RTL_R8(0xef) & 0x010)" conditionals
from the previous iteration have been removed. If it is done on purpose, a
short explanation or notification in the description of the patch is always
welcome.
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists