[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1298504269.2211.503.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:37:49 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: kernel@...uxace.com, andy@...yhouse.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bonding: fix incorrect transmit queue offset
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 15:13 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:08:44 -0800
>
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:42:49PM -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> >> + * destination queue. Using a helper function skips the a call to
> >
> > s/the a/a/ or s/the a/the/
> >
> >> + while (txq >= dev->real_num_tx_queues) {
> >> + /* let the user know if we do not have enough tx queues */
> >> + if (net_ratelimit())
> >> + pr_warning("%s selects invalid tx queue %d. Consider"
> >> + " setting module option tx_queues > %d.",
> >> + dev->name, txq, dev->real_num_tx_queues);
> >> + txq -= dev->real_num_tx_queues;
> >> + }
> >
> > Think this would be better as a WARN_ONCE, as otherwise syslog will still
> > get flooded with this - even when ratelimited. See get_rps_cpu in
> > net/core/dev.c as an example.o
>
> Agreed.
This shouldn't WARN at all. It is perfectly valid (though non-optimal)
to have different numbers of queues on two different multiqueue devices.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists