netdev - Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110226031118.GA21270@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:11:18 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	rick.jones2@...com, tgraf@...radead.org, therbert@...gle.com,
	wsommerfeld@...gle.com, daniel.baluta@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel?

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:07:23PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:48:48 +0800
> 
> > I'm looking at redoing this and the bulk of the work is going to
> > be restructuring ip_append_data/ip_push_pending_frames so that it
> > doesn't store the states in sk/inet_sk.
> 
> I suppose you're going to replace that stuff with an on-stack
> control structure that gets passed around by reference or
> similar?

Either that or have ip_append_data do ip_push_pending_frames
directly.

That function's signature is a mess already and I need to think
about this a bit more :)

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html