netdev - Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1298705484.2659.126.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Sat, 26 Feb 2011 08:31:24 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rick.jones2@...com,
	tgraf@...radead.org, therbert@...gle.com, wsommerfeld@...gle.com,
	daniel.baluta@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel?

Le samedi 26 février 2011 à 11:11 +0800, Herbert Xu a écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:07:23PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> > Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:48:48 +0800
> > 
> > > I'm looking at redoing this and the bulk of the work is going to
> > > be restructuring ip_append_data/ip_push_pending_frames so that it
> > > doesn't store the states in sk/inet_sk.
> > 
> > I suppose you're going to replace that stuff with an on-stack
> > control structure that gets passed around by reference or
> > similar?
> 
> Either that or have ip_append_data do ip_push_pending_frames
> directly.
> 
> That function's signature is a mess already and I need to think
> about this a bit more :)
> 
> Cheers,


UDP CORK is a problem indeed. I wonder who really uses it ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html