netdev - Re: [patch net-next-2.6 V3] net: convert bonding to use rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110228070732.GA2793@psychotron.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:07:33 +0100
From:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	fubar@...ibm.com, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com, kaber@...sh.net,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, andy@...yhouse.net,
	anna.fischer@...com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 V3] net: convert bonding to use rx_handler

Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:22:08AM CET, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
>Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:58:17 +0100
>
>> That is very true. And given that af_packet uses orig_dev to obtain
>> ifindex, it can be replaced by skb->skb_iif. That way we can get rid of
>> orig_dev parameter for good.
>
>I would rather see a complete patch set submitting at a unit, thanks.
>
>I've already marked your V3 last night as "changes requested" in
>patchwork for this reason.

That's a pity. V3 is complete patch. The changes we talk about in
discussion are just taking advantage of changes in patch V3. Would be in
my opinion better to apply V3 now and followup with the rest after that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html