netdev - Re: [patch net-next-2.6 V3] net: convert bonding to use rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:30:13 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jpirko@...hat.com
Cc:	fubar@...ibm.com, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com, kaber@...sh.net,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, andy@...yhouse.net,
	anna.fischer@...com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 V3] net: convert bonding to use rx_handler

From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:07:33 +0100

> Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:22:08AM CET, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>>From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
>>Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:58:17 +0100
>>
>>> That is very true. And given that af_packet uses orig_dev to obtain
>>> ifindex, it can be replaced by skb->skb_iif. That way we can get rid of
>>> orig_dev parameter for good.
>>
>>I would rather see a complete patch set submitting at a unit, thanks.
>>
>>I've already marked your V3 last night as "changes requested" in
>>patchwork for this reason.
> 
> That's a pity. V3 is complete patch. The changes we talk about in
> discussion are just taking advantage of changes in patch V3. Would be in
> my opinion better to apply V3 now and followup with the rest after that.

Fair enough, I'll aply it now, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html