netdev - Re: [PATCH 13/17] mlx4: Add blue flame support for kernel consumers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=uRL2GAb7CBqJiVUuXTgpX_w7=3PZ3JdmL_+jj@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:07:48 -0800
From:	Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
To:	Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.co.il>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eli@...lanox.co.il
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] mlx4: Add blue flame support for kernel consumers

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Yevgeny Petrilin
<yevgenyp@...lanox.co.il> wrote:
> +       if (map_bf_area(dev))
> +               mlx4_dbg(dev, "Kernel support for blue flame is not available for kernels < 2.6.28\n");

This seems like a really bad error message.  Can map_bf_area() actually fail?

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html