[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110308024356.GV11864@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 21:43:57 -0500
From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To: Nicolas de Pesloüan
<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6] net: reinject arps into bonding slave
instead of master
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:09:48AM +0100, Nicolas de Pesloüan wrote:
>
> After Jiri's last patch series, bond_arp_rcv() is not registered anymore
> as a protocol handler on bond0, but directly called from inside
> bond_handle_frame(), through bond->recv_probe.
>
> Because bond_handler_frame() is a rx_handler for the slave interfaces,
> bond_arp_rcv() is now called at the slave level and not a the master
> level anymore.
>
> Hence this patch and the reason I thought it should work.
>
> Did you tested this patch with Jiri's previous patches applied before?
>
No, I have not tested them yet. I looked at this problem first as
Jiri's patch did not fix a regression in code that is actually in
net-next right now.
I don't have a problem with the work you and Jiri are doing on this
latest patch series, but the frequency of patch revisions and now
regressions concerns me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists