[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikTNH3Lux-rusmtf0Xca=s0wtNzy8N4OxPjnO21@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:10:45 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com,
andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 1/6] af_packet: use skb->skb_iif instead of orig_dev->ifindex
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> wrote:
> Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 07:59:39AM CET, xiaosuo@...il.com wrote:
>>>
>>
>>1557 static void dev_queue_xmit_nit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>....
>>
>>1571 if (pt_prev) {
>>1572 deliver_skb(skb2, pt_prev, skb->dev);
>>1573 pt_prev = ptype;
>>1574 continue;
>>1575 }
>>...
>>1603 }
>>1604 if (pt_prev)
>>1605 pt_prev->func(skb2, skb->dev, pt_prev, skb->dev);
>>1606 rcu_read_unlock();
>>1607 }
>
> I'm probably missign something but I do not see the connection between
> this and setting up sll->sll_ifindex in net/packet/af_packet.c
>
Think about a packet socket(with origdev set) for packets emitted via
NIC eth0, and sll->sll_ifindex is eth0->ifindex, but after your patch,
sll->sll_ifindex may be ZERO or the ifindex of the RX NIC for the
forwarded packets. However, I don't know if this origdev usage is
valid. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists