netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dev : fix mtu check when TSO is enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D7E65DB.8070708@free.fr>
Date:	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:00:43 +0100
From:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net, nightnord@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dev : fix mtu check when TSO is enabled

On 03/14/2011 06:01 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 14 mars 2011 à 17:08 +0100, Daniel Lezcano a écrit :
>> In case the device where is coming from the packet has TSO enabled,
>> we should not check the mtu size value as this one could be bigger
>> than the expected value.
>>
>> This is the case for the macvlan driver when the lower device has
>> TSO enabled. The macvlan inherit this feature and forward the packets
>> without fragmenting them. Then the packets go through dev_forward_skb
>> and are dropped. This patch fix this by checking TSO is not enabled
>> when we want to check the mtu size.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
>> Cc: Patrick McHardy<kaber@...sh.net>
>> Cc: Andrian Nord<nightnord@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   net/core/dev.c |    6 ++++--
>>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>> index 6561021..010a0a9 100644
>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>> @@ -1526,8 +1526,10 @@ int dev_forward_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>   	skb_orphan(skb);
>>   	nf_reset(skb);
>>
>> -	if (unlikely(!(dev->flags&  IFF_UP) ||
>> -		     (skb->len>  (dev->mtu + dev->hard_header_len + VLAN_HLEN)))) {
>> +	if (unlikely(!(skb->dev->features&  NETIF_F_TSO)&&
>
> Sorry, this needs a comment at least, or even better a helper function
> on its own.
>
> We test both skb->dev&  dev, pointing to different devices, this is
> really error prone.
>
> Are we sure all callers set skb->dev before calling  dev_forward_skb() ?

Thanks Eric for the comments, I will resend a new version.

   -- Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html