[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110314.152704.98879085.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: msmith@...co.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable rp_filter for IPsec packets
From: Michael Smith <msmith@...co.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:23:20 -0400
> David Miller wrote:
>
>> Existing arguments might be large enough to carry more than one piece
>> of information :-)
>
> If it's encoded into another argument, would there be more overhead
> from bit-shifting it out than you'd save by losing an argument?
It sure will if it's the different between the argument being passed
in a register vs. on the stack.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists