[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D806ECB.4000205@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:03:23 +0200
From: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: Refcount destination entry on xfrm_lookup
On 03/16/2011 09:12 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> We return a destination entry without refcount if a socket
> policy is found in xfrm_lookup. This triggers a warning on
> a negative refcount when freeeing this dst entry. So take
> a refcount in this case to fix it.
>
> This refcount was forgotten when xfrm changed to cache bundles
> instead of policies for outgoing flows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Acked-by: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
Ok. This is one of the corner cases I did not test: having socket policy
something else than no action. I just didn't have the application ready
for it. Sorry about the bug. And good catch Steffen.
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index 027e3c6..15792d8 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -1804,6 +1804,8 @@ restart:
> goto no_transform;
> }
>
> + dst_hold(&xdst->u.dst);
> +
> spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_sk_bundle_lock);
> xdst->u.dst.next = xfrm_policy_sk_bundles;
> xfrm_policy_sk_bundles = &xdst->u.dst;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists