netdev - Re: xfrm: Fix initialize repl field of struct xfrm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D86F1FD.3080009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:36:45 +0800
From:	Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Subject: Re: xfrm: Fix initialize repl field of struct xfrm_state


> From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:45:39 +0800
>
>> Commit 'xfrm: Move IPsec replay detection functions to a separate file'
>>   (9fdc4883d92d20842c5acea77a4a21bb1574b495)
>> introduce repl field to struct xfrm_state, and only initialize it
>> under SA's netlink create path, the other path, such as pf_key, the
>> repl field remaining uninitialize. So if the SA is created by pf_key,
>> any input packet with SA's encryption algorithm will cause panic.
> Please, either add an xfrm_init_replay() call to the appropriate spot
> in net/key/af_key.c or, if possible, only have the one call in
> xfrm_init_state().  Don't leave two calls, one in xfrm_user.c and one
> in xfrm_state.c
>
> Anyways, I don't think just making one call from xfrm_init_state() is
> possible, because the replay settings need to be assigned before we
> can properly call xfrm_init_replay().
>
> Therefore, please fix this by adding the necessary call to af_key.c
Sorry for not said clearly, at the first time I want to do like this. 
But when I grep 'xfrm_init_state', it be used in many place, not
any pf_key, but also XFRM MIGRATE, ipcomp, ipcomp6. So I did this ugly
patch by add this to xfrm_init_state() to avoid dup code.

Not sure whether the other case like ipcomp/ipcomp6 etc can cause panic, if
it panic, maybe we can fix by introduce new xfrm_init_replay() function
like to assign the default reply function.
  int xfrm_init_replay(struct xfrm_state *x)
  {
  	x->repl = &xfrm_replay_legacy;
  	return 0;
  }
and change the orig xfrm_init_replay to xfrm_update_replay()? 
Or dup those code to all used place?

If I was wrong, I will fix this by adding the necessary call to af_key.c.

Thanks.


> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html