[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8DD2590731AB5D4C9DBF71A877482A900183167B00@orsmsx509.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:16:42 -0700
From: "Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
To: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@...com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH]: e1000e: If ASPM L0s needs to be disabled, do it
prior to enabling device
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Naga Chumbalkar [mailto:nagananda.chumbalkar@...com]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 12:49 PM
>To: davem@...emloft.net
>Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Naga Chumbalkar; Allan, Bruce W
>Subject: [RFC][PATCH]: e1000e: If ASPM L0s needs to be disabled, do it prior to
>enabling device
>
>If ASPM L0s needs to be disabled due to HW errata, do it prior to
>"enabling" the device. This way if the kernel ever defaults its
>aspm_policy to POLICY_POWERSAVE, then the e1000e driver will get a
>chance to disable ASPM on the misbehaving device *prior* to calling
>pci_enable_device_mem(). This will be useful in situations
>where the BIOS indicates ASPM support on the server by clearing the
>ACPI FADT "ASPM Controls" bit.
>
>Note:
>The kernel (2.6.38) currently uses the BIOS "default" as its aspm_policy.
>However, Linux distros can diverge from that and set the default to "powersave".
>
>Signed-off-by: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@...com>
>Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
>
>---
> drivers/net/e1000e/82571.c | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/82571.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/82571.c
>index 89a6903..5fddc94 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/82571.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/82571.c
>@@ -431,9 +431,6 @@ static s32 e1000_get_variants_82571(struct e1000_adapter
>*adapter)
> case e1000_82573:
> case e1000_82574:
> case e1000_82583:
>- /* Disable ASPM L0s due to hardware errata */
>- e1000e_disable_aspm(adapter->pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S);
>-
> if (pdev->device == E1000_DEV_ID_82573L) {
> adapter->flags |= FLAG_HAS_JUMBO_FRAMES;
> adapter->max_hw_frame_size = DEFAULT_JUMBO;
>@@ -2066,7 +2063,8 @@ struct e1000_info e1000_82573_info = {
> | FLAG_HAS_SMART_POWER_DOWN
> | FLAG_HAS_AMT
> | FLAG_HAS_SWSM_ON_LOAD,
>- .flags2 = FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L1,
>+ .flags2 = FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L1
>+ | FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S,
> .pba = 20,
> .max_hw_frame_size = ETH_FRAME_LEN + ETH_FCS_LEN,
> .get_variants = e1000_get_variants_82571,
>@@ -2086,7 +2084,8 @@ struct e1000_info e1000_82574_info = {
> | FLAG_HAS_SMART_POWER_DOWN
> | FLAG_HAS_AMT
> | FLAG_HAS_CTRLEXT_ON_LOAD,
>- .flags2 = FLAG2_CHECK_PHY_HANG,
>+ .flags2 = FLAG2_CHECK_PHY_HANG
>+ | FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S,
> .pba = 32,
> .max_hw_frame_size = DEFAULT_JUMBO,
> .get_variants = e1000_get_variants_82571,
>@@ -2104,6 +2103,7 @@ struct e1000_info e1000_82583_info = {
> | FLAG_HAS_SMART_POWER_DOWN
> | FLAG_HAS_AMT
> | FLAG_HAS_CTRLEXT_ON_LOAD,
>+ .flags2 = FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S,
> .pba = 32,
> .max_hw_frame_size = ETH_FRAME_LEN + ETH_FCS_LEN,
> .get_variants = e1000_get_variants_82571,
>diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
>index 00bf595..ff224a7 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
>+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h
>@@ -458,6 +458,7 @@ struct e1000_info {
> #define FLAG2_DMA_BURST (1 << 6)
> #define FLAG2_DISABLE_AIM (1 << 8)
> #define FLAG2_CHECK_PHY_HANG (1 << 9)
>+#define FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S (1 << 10)
>
> #define E1000_RX_DESC_PS(R, i) \
> (&(((union e1000_rx_desc_packet_split *)((R).desc))[i]))
>diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
>index a39d4a4..f60deec 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
>@@ -5393,13 +5393,19 @@ static int __e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>+ static int aspm_disable_flag;
> u32 err;
>
>+ if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S)
>+ aspm_disable_flag = PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S;
>+ if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L1)
>+ aspm_disable_flag |= PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1;
>+ if (aspm_disable_flag)
>+ e1000e_disable_aspm(pdev, aspm_disable_flag);
>+
> pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
> pci_restore_state(pdev);
> pci_save_state(pdev);
>- if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L1)
>- e1000e_disable_aspm(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1);
>
> e1000e_set_interrupt_capability(adapter);
> if (netif_running(netdev)) {
>@@ -5643,11 +5649,17 @@ static pci_ers_result_t e1000_io_slot_reset(struct
>pci_dev *pdev)
> struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>+ static int aspm_disable_flag;
> int err;
> pci_ers_result_t result;
>
>+ if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S)
>+ aspm_disable_flag = PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S;
> if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L1)
>- e1000e_disable_aspm(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1);
>+ aspm_disable_flag |= PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1;
>+ if (aspm_disable_flag)
>+ e1000e_disable_aspm(pdev, aspm_disable_flag);
>+
> err = pci_enable_device_mem(pdev);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>@@ -5789,12 +5801,17 @@ static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> resource_size_t flash_start, flash_len;
>
> static int cards_found;
>+ static int aspm_disable_flag;
> int i, err, pci_using_dac;
> u16 eeprom_data = 0;
> u16 eeprom_apme_mask = E1000_EEPROM_APME;
>
>+ if (ei->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S)
>+ aspm_disable_flag = PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S;
> if (ei->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L1)
>- e1000e_disable_aspm(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1);
>+ aspm_disable_flag |= PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1;
>+ if (aspm_disable_flag)
>+ e1000e_disable_aspm(pdev, aspm_disable_flag);
>
> err = pci_enable_device_mem(pdev);
> if (err)
>--
>1.7.1.2
Yeah, I was thinking this very thing was needed after seeing the patchset
from Naga yesterday on linux-pci/lkml, but was beaten to it ;-)
Jeff Kirsher, when you pull this into your tree for Intel validation, you
can add my ACK to it.
Thanks Naga,
Bruce.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists