[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110323.123427.242111674.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: yevgenyp@...lanox.co.il, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eugenia@...lanox.co.il
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] mlx4_en: Reporting HW revision in ethtool -i
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:04:14 +0000
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 10:38 +0200, Yevgeny Petrilin wrote:
>> HW revision is derived from device ID and rev id.
> [...]
>> - sprintf(drvinfo->driver, DRV_NAME " (%s)", mdev->dev->board_id);
>> + switch (mdev->dev->rev_id) {
>> + case 0xa0:
>> + if (dev->dev_id >= MLX4_EN_CX3_LOW_ID && dev->dev_id <= MLX4_EN_CX3_HIGH_ID)
>> + sprintf(drvinfo->driver, DRV_NAME " (%s_CX-3)", mdev->dev->board_id);
>> + else
>> + sprintf(drvinfo->driver, DRV_NAME " (%s_CX)", mdev->dev->board_id);
>> + break;
>> + case 0xb0:
>> + sprintf(drvinfo->driver, DRV_NAME " (%s_CX-2)", mdev->dev->board_id);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + sprintf(drvinfo->driver, DRV_NAME " (%s)", mdev->dev->board_id);
>> + break;
> [...]
>
> This is an abuse of the ethtool_drvinfo::driver field.
>
> Your users can use lspci -v, can't they?
Agreed, mlx4 folks please send me a follow-up patch that removes this
conditional string.
The driver string is only meant to identify the software, not the
hardware variant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists