lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110402124207.GB3147@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date:	Sat, 2 Apr 2011 14:42:07 +0200
From:	Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To:	Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: extending feature word.

On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 07:07:05PM -0700, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> Thanks for your comments on my loop-back patch. I was looking at the
> code today from the perspective of extending various "features" for
> word to an array of words and as Michael has pointed out, it's a huge
> change. So I'm thinking on the following lines
> (include/linux/netdevice.h)
> 
> +#define DEV_FEATURE_WORDS      2
> +#define LEGACY_FEATURE_WORD    0
>        /* currently active device features */
> -       u32                     features;
> +       u32                     features[DEV_FEATURE_WORDS];
>        /* user-changeable features */
> -       u32                     hw_features;
> +       u32                     hw_features[DEV_FEATURE_WORDS];
>        /* user-requested features */
> -       u32                     wanted_features;
> +       u32                     wanted_features[DEV_FEATURE_WORDS];
>        /* VLAN feature mask */
> -       u32                     vlan_features;
> +       u32                     vlan_features[DEV_FEATURE_WORDS];
> +#define legacy_features                features[LEGACY_FEATURE_WORD]
> +#define legacy_hw_features     hw_features[LEGACY_FEATURE_WORD]
> +#define legacy_wanted_features wanted_features[LEGACY_FEATURE_WORD]
> +#define legacy_vlan_features    vlan_features[LEGACY_FEATURE_WORD]
> 
> 
> So that it will be a matter of -
> 
> s/features/legacy_features/
> s/hw_features/legacy_hw_features/
> s/wanted_features/legacy_wanted_features/
> s/vlan_features/legacy_vlan_features/
> 
> to start with as a first step. Once this is done, legacy_* can be
> changed with respective arrays and modified as per the need. Comments?

You could just s/features/features[0]/ as well. Why the extra hiding?

If you want to split the work, it would be clearer to first convert
hw_features and wanted_features (with all the core code touching it -
this is the easy part), then vlan_features (this includes drivers'
and VLAN code) and then features (it's all over).

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ