[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110405071915.GA3640@psychotron.lan>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:19:18 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To: Nicolas de Pesloüan
<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
andy@...yhouse.net, xiaosuo@...il.com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6] net: vlan: make non-hw-accel rx path
similar to hw-accel
Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:51:25PM CEST, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com wrote:
>Le 04/04/2011 22:30, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
>>Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:00:00PM CEST, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com wrote:
>>>Le 04/04/2011 09:14, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
><snip>
>>>So you want to move vlan_do_receive into an rx_handler, but want
>>>untagging to stay hard-coded at the beginning of __netif_receive_skb.
>>>I don't think I understand the rational behind that.
>>
>>vlan_hwaccel_do_receive/vlan_do_receive could be converted to
>>rx_handler, not untagging.
>
>Why do you consider untagging cannot be converted to rx_handler?
I already told you that the reason ot the patch is to unify hwaccel path
and nonhwaccel path. When you do untag in rx_handler, that's too late.
Paths would be still different.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists