[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110414160717.32251.81326.sendpatchset@krkumar2.in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:37:17 +0530
From: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ip6_pol_route panic: Do not propagate LOOPBACK to VLAN
I have tested two ways of fixing this panic:
1. PATCH1: Do not allow vlan on lo.
2. PATCH2: Do not propagate LOOPBACK to vlan devices.
Isn't it better to use PATCH1 and disallow vlan on lo?
The result of this patch is:
# modprobe 8021q
# vconfig add lo 43
# ifconfig lo.69 hw ether 00:80:48:BA:d1:30
# ping6 -c 3 fe80::280:48ff:feba:d130
connect: Cannot assign requested address
(no panic)
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
---
net/8021q/vlan_dev.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -ruNp org/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c new2/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c
--- org/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c 2011-04-14 20:42:56.000000000 +0530
+++ new2/net/8021q/vlan_dev.c 2011-04-14 20:44:35.000000000 +0530
@@ -525,7 +525,8 @@ static int vlan_dev_init(struct net_devi
/* IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_MULTICAST; ??? */
dev->flags = real_dev->flags & ~(IFF_UP | IFF_PROMISC | IFF_ALLMULTI |
- IFF_MASTER | IFF_SLAVE);
+ IFF_MASTER | IFF_SLAVE |
+ IFF_LOOPBACK);
dev->iflink = real_dev->ifindex;
dev->state = (real_dev->state & ((1<<__LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER) |
(1<<__LINK_STATE_DORMANT))) |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists