netdev - Re: [RFC v3 5/6] j1939: rename NAME to UUID?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DB19B46.4000306@hartkopp.net>
Date:	Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:14:14 +0200
From:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To:	Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@....be>
CC:	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 5/6] j1939: rename NAME to UUID?

On 22.04.2011 16:18, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:24:39AM +0200, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
>> I need to git pull the latest updates, and I'll send a revised patchset
>> tomorrow.
> Oliver,
> 
> I did not forget, but something came in between. next week for sure.

Oh, no problem.

I'm constantly working on my reply to your latest answer 8-)

BTW: Do you have any sample code that shows, how the sending (and receiving)
of the same BAM message would look like in the static and in the
address-claimed case?? I'm not really able to extract this information from
your posted documentation.

I would like to know

- what has to be configured before (from the user and the admin)
- how does the application source code look like in the requested four cases

I think we're a bit stuck in the discussion of the 'easy to use' socket API
without having real-world examples.

Thanks,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html