[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110423055109.GC330@kurt.e-circ.dyndns.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:51:09 +0200
From: Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@....be>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc: socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 5/6] j1939: rename NAME to UUID?
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 05:14:14PM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 22.04.2011 16:18, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:24:39AM +0200, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> >> I need to git pull the latest updates, and I'll send a revised patchset
> >> tomorrow.
> > Oliver,
> >
> > I did not forget, but something came in between. next week for sure.
>
> Oh, no problem.
>
> I'm constantly working on my reply to your latest answer 8-)
>
> BTW: Do you have any sample code that shows, how the sending (and receiving)
> of the same BAM message would look like in the static and in the
> address-claimed case?? I'm not really able to extract this information from
> your posted documentation.
>
> I would like to know
>
> - what has to be configured before (from the user and the admin)
> - how does the application source code look like in the requested four cases
>
> I think we're a bit stuck in the discussion of the 'easy to use' socket API
> without having real-world examples.
ack.
Since I think I got the stack stable now (and some LOC dropped), I agree that
'simple' real-world examples may document a lot.
>
> Thanks,
> Oliver
Kurt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists