| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:51:09 +0200 From: Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@....be> To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net> Cc: socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v3 5/6] j1939: rename NAME to UUID? On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 05:14:14PM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > On 22.04.2011 16:18, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:24:39AM +0200, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > >> I need to git pull the latest updates, and I'll send a revised patchset > >> tomorrow. > > Oliver, > > > > I did not forget, but something came in between. next week for sure. > > Oh, no problem. > > I'm constantly working on my reply to your latest answer 8-) > > BTW: Do you have any sample code that shows, how the sending (and receiving) > of the same BAM message would look like in the static and in the > address-claimed case?? I'm not really able to extract this information from > your posted documentation. > > I would like to know > > - what has to be configured before (from the user and the admin) > - how does the application source code look like in the requested four cases > > I think we're a bit stuck in the discussion of the 'easy to use' socket API > without having real-world examples. ack. Since I think I got the stack stable now (and some LOC dropped), I agree that 'simple' real-world examples may document a lot. > > Thanks, > Oliver Kurt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists