[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303863970.2850.31.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 01:26:10 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix netdev_increment_features()
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 18:31 +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> Simplify and fix netdev_increment_features() to conform to what is
> stated in netdevice.h comments about NETIF_F_ONE_FOR_ALL.
> Include FCoE segmentation and VLAN-challedged flags in computation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
> ---
>
> I noticed this while converting bridge code to hw_features. After
> adding devices to the bridge all features were always cleared regardless
> of features active in those devices.
>
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 7 ++++++-
> net/core/dev.c | 37 ++++++++++++-------------------------
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 405ce21..86140e4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -1107,7 +1107,12 @@ struct net_device {
> */
> #define NETIF_F_ONE_FOR_ALL (NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE | NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST | \
> NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | \
> - NETIF_F_FRAGLIST)
> + NETIF_F_FRAGLIST | NETIF_F_VLAN_CHALLENGED)
I think we can also add NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX, now that
dev_hard_start_xmit() handles VLAN tag insertion.
> + /*
> + * If one device doesn't support one of these features, then disable it
> + * for all in netdev_increment_features.
> + */
> +#define NETIF_F_ALL_FOR_ALL (NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY | NETIF_F_FSO)
Shouldn't most RX offloads be included in this? Though it doesn't
really matter that much.
> /* changeable features with no special hardware requirements */
> #define NETIF_F_SOFT_FEATURES (NETIF_F_GSO | NETIF_F_GRO)
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 3871bf6..1a2c91c 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -6184,33 +6184,20 @@ static int dev_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> */
> u32 netdev_increment_features(u32 all, u32 one, u32 mask)
> {
> + if (mask & NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM)
> + mask |= NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM;
> + mask |= NETIF_F_VLAN_CHALLENGED;
> +
> + all |= one & (NETIF_F_ONE_FOR_ALL|NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM) & mask;
> + all &= one | ~NETIF_F_ALL_FOR_ALL;
> +
> /* If device needs checksumming, downgrade to it. */
> - if (all & NETIF_F_NO_CSUM && !(one & NETIF_F_NO_CSUM))
> - all ^= NETIF_F_NO_CSUM | (one & NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM);
> - else if (mask & NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM) {
> - /* If one device supports v4/v6 checksumming, set for all. */
> - if (one & (NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM) &&
> - !(all & NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM)) {
> - all &= ~NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM;
> - all |= one & (NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM);
> - }
> + if (all & (NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM & ~NETIF_F_NO_CSUM))
> + all &= ~NETIF_F_NO_CSUM;
>
> - /* If one device supports hw checksumming, set for all. */
> - if (one & NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM && !(all & NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM)) {
> - all &= ~NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM;
> - all |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - /* If device can't no cache copy, don't do for all */
> - if (!(one & NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY))
> - all &= ~NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY;
> -
> - one |= NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM;
> -
> - one |= all & NETIF_F_ONE_FOR_ALL;
> - all &= one | NETIF_F_LLTX | NETIF_F_GSO | NETIF_F_UFO;
> - all |= one & mask & NETIF_F_ONE_FOR_ALL;
> + /* If one device supports hw checksumming, set for all. */
> + if (all & NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM)
> + all &= ~(NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM & ~NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM);
>
> return all;
> }
Well it might be correct, but it's hard to tell. Can we see your unit
tests, please?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists