netdev - Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2011-04-25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110429031143.GA2353@joana>
Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:11:43 -0300
From:	"Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@...fusion.mobi>
To:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linville@...driver.com,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2011-04-25

* Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> [2011-04-25 15:55:24 -0500]:

> On 04/25/2011 03:04 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Miller<davem@...emloft.net>
> > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >> From: "John W. Linville"<linville@...driver.com>
> >> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:30:17 -0400
> >>
> >>> Here is another big batch of updates intended for 2.6.40...
> >>>
> >>> There is the usual huge batch of changes for ath9k, and iwlagn, a bunch
> >>> for ath9k_htc, rt2x00, and ath5k, a few more for mwifiex, and a handful
> >>> of others.  Also included is a big batch of Bluetooth updates as well.
> >>>
> >>> Please let me know if there are problems!
> >>
> >> Pulled, thanks a lot John.
> >
> > I guess watching the build logs for new warnings is too old fashioned
> > for people, and besides Dave will do it for everyone anyways right?
> >
> > And this one is a real bug too. :-/
> >
> > I'll push this out to net-next-2.6 on top of the wireless-next pull,
> > but please be more mindful in the future.
> 
> Unfortunately, the 64-bit variant of gcc v4.5.1 will miss some of these. I find 
> I need to compile code on a 32-bit system and using an older compiler to catch 
> all. Perhaps that explains the error that crept through here.

That could be a reason, I have gcc 4.5.2 (64-bit). I've built this code many times
before send pull request and never saw that warning, and it's clearly a bug,
indeed. 

-- 
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://profusion.mobi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html