netdev - Re: Is 802.3ad mode in bonding useful ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DBA2DDC.80502@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:17:48 +0800
From:	WeipingPan <panweiping3@...il.com>
To:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is 802.3ad mode in bonding useful ?

On 04/28/2011 08:21 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:33:50PM +0800, WeipingPan wrote:
>> Hi, all,
>>
>> 802.3ad mode in bonding implements 802.3ad standard.
>>
>> I am just wondering  802.3ad mode is useful,
>> since  bonding has many modes like balance-rr, active-backup, etc.
>>
> Yes, of course its usefull.  For switches which support 802.3ad, this mode
> allows for both peers to understand that the links in the bond are acting as an
> aggregate, which makes it easier to prevent things like inadvertently looped
> back frames, for which the other modes have to have all sorts of hacks to
> prevent.
What is looped back frames here ?
I didn't see any special code to handle looped back frames in other 
modes in bonding,
can you take an example ?

thanks
Weiping Pan

> Neil
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html