[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110502110315.GB32576@verge.net.au>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 20:03:15 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Hans Schillstrom <hans@...illstrom.com>
Cc: ja@....bg, ebiederm@...ssion.com, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
hans.schillstrom@...csson.com
Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to enable name
space exit.
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> To work this patch also needs the other patches in this series.
Hi Hans,
could you explain the implications statement above?
What kind of behaviour might I expect if only this patch is applied?
I'm planning to push this and 2/6 for 2.6.39, and as we have
discussed (offline) that combination works. But from a bisection
point of view, this patch needs to not "blow up" if used by itself.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists