[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kqgtk9j.d83e4dced2edb2820c7e6329f634bb3f@obelix.schillstrom.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:40:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Hans Schillstrom" <hans@...illstrom.com>
To: "Simon Horman" <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: ja@....bg, ebiederm@...ssion.com, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
hans.schillstrom@...csson.com
Subject: Re: Re: [v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to
enable name space exit.
>Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011, 13:03 PM
>Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to enable name space exit.
>
>On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
>> To work this patch also needs the other patches in this series.
>
>Hi Hans,
>
>could you explain the implications statement above?
>What kind of behaviour might I expect if only this patch is applied?
Oops, left there by misstake.
Can you remove that line before pushing it ?
>I'm planning to push this and 2/6 for 2.6.39, and as we have
>discussed (offline) that combination works. But from a bisection
>point of view, this patch needs to not "blow up" if used by itself.
It should not be any bisect. problems from what I can see.
Regards
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists