netdev - Re: Re: [v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to enable name space exit.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110502122627.GA19710@verge.net.au>
Date:	Mon, 2 May 2011 21:26:27 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Hans Schillstrom <hans@...illstrom.com>
Cc:	ja@....bg, ebiederm@...ssion.com, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	hans.schillstrom@...csson.com
Subject: Re: Re: [v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to enable name
 space exit.

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> >Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011, 13:03 PM
> >Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to enable name space exit.
> >
> >On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> >> To work this patch also needs the other patches in this series.
> >
> >Hi Hans,
> >
> >could you explain the implications statement above?
> >What kind of behaviour might I expect if only this patch is applied?
> 
> Oops, left there by misstake.
> Can you remove that line before pushing it ?

Will do.

> >I'm planning to push this and 2/6 for 2.6.39, and as we have
> >discussed (offline) that combination works. But from a bisection
> >point of view, this patch needs to not "blow up" if used by itself.
> 
> It should not be any bisect. problems from what I can see.

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html