[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878vungyq4.fsf@purkki.adurom.net>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 02:18:11 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...rom.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A race in register_netdevice()
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> writes:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:36:37 +0300
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@...rom.com> wrote:
>
>> there seems to be a race in register_netdevice(), which is reported here:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15606
>>
>> This is visible at least with flimflam and ath6kl. Basically what
>> happens is this:
>>
>> Apr 29 00:21:35 roska flimflamd[2598]: src/udev.c:add_net_device()
>> Apr 29 00:21:35 roska flimflamd[2598]: connman_inet_ifname: SIOCGIFNAME(index
>> 4): No such device
>> Apr 29 00:21:45 roska flimflamd[2598]: src/rtnl.c:rtnl_message() buf
>> 0xbfefda3c len 1004
>> Apr 29 00:21:45 roska flimflamd[2598]: src/rtnl.c:rtnl_message()
>> NEWLINK len 1004 type 16 flags 0x0000 seq 0
[...]
>> I have confirmed that both of these patches fix the issue. Now I'm
>> wondering which one is the best way forward. Or is there a better way
>> to fix this?
>>
>
> I see no problem with moving this.
> SIOCGIFNAME should not need to hold rtnl.
I'm having difficulties of fixing the race and exploring other
options. Is there any particular issue why SIOCGIFNAME should not take
rtnl?
--
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists