[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110504232854.GA11687@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 01:28:54 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: tap/bridge: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO/NETIF_F_SG
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:34:15AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:18:14PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > BTW, I just noticed that net-next spits out
> > many of the following when I run any VMs:
> >
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_SG since no checksum feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO since no SG feature.
> > tap0: Features changed: 0x401b4849 -> 0x40004040
> > device msttap0 entered promiscuous mode
> > br0: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO since no SG feature.
> > br0: port 1(msttap0) entering forwarding state
> > br0: port 1(msttap0) entering forwarding state
> > tap0: Features changed: 0x40004040 -> 0x40024849
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_SG since no checksum feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO since no SG feature.
> > tap0: Features changed: 0x40024849 -> 0x40004040
> > br0: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO since no SG feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_SG since no checksum feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO since no SG feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_SG since no checksum feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO since no SG feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_SG since no checksum feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO since no SG feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_SG since no checksum feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO since no SG feature.
> > tap0: Features changed: 0x40004040 -> 0x401b4849
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_SG since no checksum feature.
> > tap0: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO since no SG feature.
> > tap0: Features changed: 0x401b4849 -> 0x40004040
> > br0: Dropping NETIF_F_GSO since no SG feature.
> >
> > My problem is not primarily with warnings:
> >
> > will that linearize all packets and disable GSO
> > for tap and bridge? If yes it can't be good
> > for performance...
> I think so. So the question is why is checksum off?
Whatever application is creating the tap0 device is not calling
ioctl(TUNSETOFFLOAD) with TUN_F_CSUM set. This is userspace bug/feature
exposed by recent changes to netdev features handling.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists