[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DC463C7.5030407@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 17:10:31 -0400
From: Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, yjwei@...fujitsu.com, jchapman@...alix.com
Subject: Re: ip_queue_xmit() used illegally
On 05/06/2011 04:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 12:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> SCTP stores it's binding information using transports and assosciations
>> and does not fill in the ->inet_{daddr,saddr} values.
>>
>> It tries to work around this route issue by checking dst->obsolete
>> directly in sctp_packet_transmit(), which just makes the race smaller
>> and does not eliminate it. ip_queue_xmit() can still end up with
>> __sk_dst_check() returning NULL and then we end up emitting a
>> potentially bogus packet.
>
> I take this back, we added this hack where things like SCTP can
> pre-route the packet by hooking up the route to the SKB before
> calling ->queue_xmit.
>
> And L2TP does something similar.
>
> So false alarm, nothing to see here :-)
>
> I still want to clean this up so that this kind of stuff can be
> handled generically inside of ->queue_xmit() by passing in the correct
> addressing information.
>
Wow, You had me scrambling there for a while. I was just about to send note
about the pre-hooked route, but you beat me to it.
The reason why sctp doesn't change the inet_addr, is because that address can theoretically
change on ever packet transmit due to multi-homing nature of SCTP.
I'll take a look at ->queue_xmit() to see if SCTP can convert to using that.
-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists