[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305312045.8178.30.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:40:45 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>, Nir Muchtar <nirm@...taire.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] RDMA: Add netlink infrastructure
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 20:12 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 19:18 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > One long term goal for me is a generic run-time mechanism
> > to prefix all pr_<level> uses not just the <foo>_dbg ones
> > with or without module or function name.
> > It will also allow the removal of all the uses of
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > New #define pr_fmt lines need to be added to the current
> > files that use pr_<level> without a prefix so it could
> > take awhile.
> Something like the +m flag documented in
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt;hb=HEAD
> ?
Yes, akin to that, but using /proc not debugfs.
Basically, just per module on/off prefixing of
module name and optionally function name via a
CONFIG_PR_LEVEL_STORE_FUNCTION_NAME.
I'd like to remove all current specific uses of
__func__ in pr_<level> and use per module
/proc controls to add them back as requested.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists