| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20110524.153930.610330240390616957.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 15:39:30 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl Cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool: ETHTOOL_SFEATURES: remove NETIF_F_COMPAT return From: Michaİİ Mirosİİaw <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:14:37 +0200 > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:03:31PM +0200, Michaİİ Mirosİİaw wrote: >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 02:09:58PM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> > You guys really need to sort this out properly. >> > Please resubmit whatever final solution is agreed upon. >> I noticed that v2.6.39 was tagged today. We should definitely remove >> NETIF_F_COMPAT so it won't bite us in the future. The other patch that >> fixes ethtool_ops->set_flags compatibility is a bugfix, so it should go >> in - if we decide that the SFEATURES compatibility should be removed >> it won't matter. >> >> Ben, do you agree? > > Ping? > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95552/ > (this is a bugfix, so should go to stable) > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95753/ > (removes ETHTOOL_F_COMPAT; this we need to decide on) You and Ben are still arguing over details. I want fresh versions of these patches (yes, both of them) once all of the issues are resolved. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists